by Jeroen Bosman & Bianca Kramer
NB Please note there is a separate, updated post based on the Plan S implementation document of May 2019
Changes in Plan S compliant options as of November 27, 2018
On October 22 we posted Eight routes towards Plan S compliance. Meanwhile, cOAlition-S, the group of funders responsible for Plan S, has put out a guidance document detailing implementation of the plan. Based on those details we updated our scheme of routes to achieve compliance.
The information in the guidance document involves some changes and additional details compared to what was made public on September 4:
- compliance of self archived (green) publications, with a few strict requirements (it has to be immediate, with copyright retained and with a CC-BY, CC-BY-SA or CC0 license)
- compliance of hybrid journals if they are part of a transformative deal with maximum length of 3 years.
- publications in mirror / sister type journals are not compliant
- no cap (yet) on APC-levels
These and some other, smaller changes effect the compliant routes available. We have hence adapted the scheme and the list of routes. For each of the routes the scheme shows examples (please treat them as such), assessments of effects on various stakeholders and on overall cost and also whether the route aligns with expected changes in the evaluation system.
In our view it is useful to discern 4 potential gold routes, 1 (temporary) hybrid route, 1 hybrid/green route and 3 potential green routes.
- Using existing or new APC-based gold journals / platforms.
- Using existing or new non-APC-based gold journals / platforms (a.k.a. diamond).
- Flipping journals to an APC-based gold model, by publishers or by editors taking the journal with them.
- Flipping journals to non-APC-based gold (diamond), by publishers or editors taking the journal with them.
- Using a hybrid journal that is part of a transformative agreement with a funder or institution. This is a temporary option (until the end of 2024).
- Publishing your article open access and CC-BY in a non-compliant hybrid journal and self-archiving that article in a compliant repository.
- Archiving the publisher version, on publication, with copyright retained and an open license.
- Archiving the accepted author manuscript, on publication, with copyright retained and an open license.
- Sharing preprints (e.g. in dedicated preprint archives) and using overlay journals for peer review.
We hope this is valuable in supporting discussions or that it will at least provoke some comments. For the latter you can either use the comments function below, use Hypothesis or use the Google Slides version of the scheme.
10 thoughts on “Nine routes towards Plan S compliance”
Pingback: Towards a Plan S gap analysis: open access potential across disciplines | Innovations in Scholarly Communication
Pingback: Plan S: a landmark en route to full and immediate Open Access – Science & research news | Frontiers
Pingback: My “S” in “Plan S” – Librarian
Pingback: Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Baffling Funder Mandate - The Scholarly Kitchen
Pingback: The Royal Society path to Plan S readiness – qBionano
Pingback: Eight routes towards Plan S compliance | Innovations in Scholarly Communication
Pingback: Plan S – links, commentary and news items | Unlocking Research
Pingback: Is Hybrid a Valid Pathway to Open Access? Publishers Argue Yes, in Response to Plan S - The Scholarly Kitchen
Pingback: Nine routes towards Plan S compliance – updated | Innovations in Scholarly Communication
Pingback: Grundlagen für die Entwicklung einer Open Scholarship-Strategie – Flavours of Open
Comments are closed.